Issuing of Police Safety Orders
Last month we ran a story on the new Police Safety Orders that came into effect on 1 July. These provide the police with additional powers to intervene in family violence call-outs. By the end of the first two weeks, around 74 safety orders have been issued nationally, with eight of them issued in Canterbury in the first week.
Police can now assess the level of risk and issue Police Safety Orders which require respondents to surrender any firearms or other weapons in their possession and to immediately leave any residence occupied by an at risk person, for up to five days. These orders can be issued with or without the consent of the at risk person.
On 2 July the first Christchurch order was issued after an argument between a couple who had both been drinking. The man was required to leave the property and his female partner was put in contact with Women’s Refuge. Police were concerned about the woman’s safety, as this couple is known to Police from previous alcohol related family violence incidents.
On 8 July the first breach of a safety order occurred in Canterbury, when a Timaru man returned to the property from which he had been removed and was then arrested by Police. In cases of safety order breaches the Courts can direct Police to issue another safety order or a temporary protection order.
This new response to dealing with family violence is not without its detractors. The New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties has expressed concern that while Police may be acting with the best of intentions, the legislation is open to abuse and there is potential for people to be needlessly criminalized. There is always the tension in this area between natural justice and ensuring family safety. It is worth noting that behind every incident of family violence is a potential homicide.
One of the key issues to the success of the PSOs will be the quality of the safety planning that occurs during the period of the order. Removing someone without ensuring work is done during that period to promote safety will see the efficacy of the orders undermined in my view.
Published on Friday, July 30th, 2010, under Announcements, Family violenceComments are closed.
Sign up to our newsletter!
Recent Posts
- Understanding the Process of Intimate Partner Homicide
- An all too common story
- Supporting the specialised development of Probation Officers
- The role of peer work and behaviour change
- Tauawhi Men’s Centre
Categories
- Announcements
- Family violence
- Learning & development
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offender work
- Practice tips and techniques
- Programme design & development
- Uncategorised
- What Ken thinks
- Youth offending
Archives
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- December 2021
- January 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- June 2018
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- July 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- July 2008