A third of domestic violence killers in Australia are middle class
Statistics presented at Australia’s National Research On Women’s Safety (ANROWS) conference by Hayley Boxall from the Australian Institute of Criminology, saw that a third of domestic violence killers in Australia are middle class, challenging the common stereotypes that family violence abusers are from disadvantaged backgrounds and are in regular contact with Police.
We have known for some time that this group of men (the research describes them as Fixated Threat [FT] offenders) are whom we worry most about in terms of lethality, particularly post-separation or when the victim is likely to re-partner. Fixated threat (FT) men constituted one-third of all intimate partner homicides (IPH) in the study (33%, n=59).
As the report indicates men fitting this profile were relatively functional in other domains of their life. In many cases, they were typically middle-class men who were well respected in their communities and had low levels of contact with the criminal justice system. Their abusive behaviour often took the form of controlling, stalking and monitoring behaviours which escalated in the context of the victim’s perceived withdrawal from the relationship (e.g. separation). This group has been variously described as pit bulls (Gottman and Jacobson, 1998) and borderline-dysphoric (Holtzworth-Munroe and Stewart: 1994).
The report also identified two other dominant pathways: Persistent and disorderly and Deterioration/acute stressor (DAS). Persistent and disorderly (PD) was the most common pathway identified in the analysis (40%, n=73). These men were often Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples; had complex histories of trauma and abuse; had co-occurring mental, emotional and physical health problems; and had significant histories of violence towards intimate partners and others.
The relationships that the PD offenders were involved in were characterised by persistent IPV and frequent criminal justice system contact (including protection orders). Despite this, separation was relatively rare for these relationships. In many cases, the lethal violence incident was similar in nature to previously reported instances of abuse he had perpetrated on the victim. However, the risk of lethal violence was significantly heightened by co-occurring individual-level and situational-specific vulnerabilities, such as heavy alcohol use or the absence of capable guardians to stop the man. Again Gottman and Jacobsen’s research indicated that while the partners of men with the Fixated Threat presentation were 75% more likely to have left the relationship by the end of five years, only twenty-five percent of women in the PD group did. They described these men as cobras.
Deterioration/acute stressor (DAS) men are an interesting group. In the study, one in 10 men (11%, n=19) were classified as DAS. These men tended to be non-Indigenous, older, and to have significant emotional, mental and physical health problems. They also demonstrated low levels or an absence of aggression and violent behaviours or tendencies. As such, criminal justice system contact was rare. DAS offenders were in long-term, “happy” and non-abusive relationships with the victim until the onset or exacerbation of a significant life stressor (or stressors) triggered a deterioration in their health and wellbeing. This shift in their trajectory had a negative impact on the man’s attitudes towards the victim (for example, he may have begun to perpetrate IPV). At the time of the lethal incident, there was no obvious intent to harm the victim. Instead, an argument would occur which, coupled with the man’s impaired emotional regulation skills, resulted in a nearly instantaneous decision to harm the victim. Men with DAS presentations were likely to seek help for the victim, demonstrate remorse and plead guilty.
The implications of this research for those working on the frontline in programs are not insignificant. No longer can we deliver a ‘One size fits all approach.’
I have been teaching for some time that the key to effective intervention is a robust front-end assessment of the respective pathways that the men travel and then nuancing any intervention to disrupt the drivers of these (stable and acute risk factors). We can then more effectively work with the drivers of the behaviours to ensure the safety of previous, current and future partners.
Congratulations to Boxall and colleagues for a great contribution to our field of knowledge. The full report can be found here.
Gottman, J. & Jacobson, N, (1998) When men batter women: new insights into ending abusive relationships, New York : Simon & Schuster
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
Published on Wednesday, March 2nd, 2022, under Family violence, What Ken thinks
Comments are closed.
Sign up for our newsletter!
Recent Posts
- Te Huringa ō Te Ao – Sustainable behaviour change for men to restore whānau wellbeing
- Working with people who don’t want to work with you
- Are you ready to seriously consider change?
- Understanding the Process of Intimate Partner Homicide
- An all too common story
Categories
- Announcements
- Family violence
- Learning & development
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offender work
- Practice tips and techniques
- Programme design & development
- Uncategorised
- What Ken thinks
- Youth offending
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- December 2021
- January 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- June 2018
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- July 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- July 2008