The gendered weight of desistance
The question of who does the social and emotional heaving lifting in relationships is a central question to the gender question. It is in my view that this is a key issue that maintains abusive practice, as well as gender imbalance.
I was excited to see the research paper by Lauren Hall and Lyndsey Harris, who have examined the experiences of women who support their male partners on their desistance journeys. The authors conceptualise a new term: Desistance Emotional Work. The paper; “The gendered weight of desistance and understanding the ‘love of a good woman’: Desistance emotional work (DEW)”
Hall and Harris explore the hidden nature of gendered support, which is often rendered invisible in the research where we often talk about the person desisting (often male). It is generally argued that desistance is around three intersecting aspects: the motivation to live life differently, the skills to live life differently, and the conditions to support changes made. It got me thinking about much of the work around desistance replicating gender disadvantage.
As Hall and Harris argue:
“Given the established inequity in women’s contributions of emotional work in their relationships comparatively to men’s, and the potential for experiencing a partner’s incarceration to impact upon the gendered roles which the couple enact (Black, 2010), it is important to consider how the desistance process may further impact the level of emotional work undertaken by women partners of male desisters. Desistance may exacerbate gendered relational inequalities and emotional work through its heteronormative expectations of women in relationships with male partners to provide resources in support of the desistance process.”
Men as a group tend to have a much small number of friends and supporters to call upon. Women, on the other hand, have more extensive networks. It is, therefore, not surprising that men will rely more on their female partners (in the case of heterosexual relationships, we don’t have data on same-sex relationships). As noted, this can have an isolating impact on the women involved.
When I read this paper, I began considering the issue from the perspective of family violence. It would be a short stretch to postulate that jealousy would quickly emerge around the female partner’s outside activities and friendships. This could escalate into further isolation and limitation of the female partner. We know that many men who are doing prison time have high anxiety about their partner’s behaviour on the outside. True relational equality is not to replicate this anxiety when they walk out the prison gate.
We know support is critically important for the maintenance of change. Perhaps it is time to unburden women from this heavy lifting and encourage men to seek out other men for support. When men can level the playing field and engage in social and emotional lifting within their relationships, we will have solid change.
Published on Wednesday, August 17th, 2022, under Family violence, What Ken thinksComments are closed.
Sign up for our newsletter!
Recent Posts
- Working with people who don’t want to work with you
- Are you ready to seriously consider change?
- Understanding the Process of Intimate Partner Homicide
- An all too common story
- Supporting the specialised development of Probation Officers
Categories
- Announcements
- Family violence
- Learning & development
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offender work
- Practice tips and techniques
- Programme design & development
- Uncategorised
- What Ken thinks
- Youth offending
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- December 2021
- January 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- June 2018
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- July 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- July 2008